Shaw Cowart represents accident injury victims in Austin and the surrounding areas

Drunk, Drugged, and Distracted Drivers: Building a Texas Wrongful Death Claim After a Fatal Crash

When a loved one is killed by a drunk driver, a drugged driver, or a driver who was staring at a phone instead of the road, the grief is inseparable from the outrage. These deaths are not accidents — they are the direct result of choices that the driver made, knowing the risk. Texas wrongful death law recognizes this distinction, and in cases involving drunk, drugged, or distracted driving, it provides families with claims not only for their economic and personal losses but also potentially for punitive damages designed to hold the worst offenders truly accountable. Austin wrongful death lawyers who represent families in these cases understand both the legal tools available and the urgency required to preserve the evidence that makes these cases winnable.

The Texas Department of Transportation reports that alcohol was a contributing factor in over 1,100 Texas traffic fatalities in 2023, and that distracted driving contributed to hundreds more. Drug-impaired driving deaths continue to rise nationally as drug use patterns shift. In Travis County and the Austin metro area, where nightlife, festivals, and dense traffic intersect, these types of crashes are a persistent cause of preventable death. Wrongful death attorneys in Austin handle a significant number of cases arising from impaired and distracted driving fatalities every year.

Families who lose a loved one to a drunk, drugged, or distracted driver often feel that a criminal prosecution — if one happens — does not fully deliver justice. A criminal conviction may result in fines and jail time, but it does nothing to address the family’s financial losses, their mental anguish, or the ongoing economic impact of the death. A Texas wrongful death civil claim, pursued alongside or independently of any criminal case, provides the compensation that the criminal system cannot. Texas wrongful death lawyers work to ensure that the full measure of what a family has lost is pursued with the same determination the situation demands.

Drunk Driving Wrongful Death Claims

Proving DUI-Related Negligence

A driver’s intoxication at the time of a fatal crash is powerful evidence of negligence per se — the legal doctrine that violation of a law designed to protect people from harm constitutes negligence as a matter of law. If the at-fault driver had a blood alcohol content at or above 0.08 — the Texas legal limit — or was otherwise shown to be impaired, the negligence element of the wrongful death claim is substantially established. Law enforcement toxicology results, field sobriety test records, dash cam footage, and witness accounts of the driver’s behavior before the crash all support the impairment case.

Dram Shop Claims Against Alcohol Providers

Texas’s Dram Shop Act provides a separate cause of action against bars, restaurants, and liquor stores that served alcohol to a visibly intoxicated person who then caused a fatal crash. Under the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code, an establishment is liable when its employees provided alcohol to someone who was obviously intoxicated and that person’s intoxication caused the death. Dram shop defendants often carry significant liquor liability insurance, making these claims an important additional source of recovery in drunk driving wrongful death cases. Evidence of dram shop liability — surveillance footage from the bar, receipts, staff witness accounts, and the driver’s consumption timeline — must be preserved immediately.

Employer Liability for Drunk Employee Drivers

When a drunk driver was operating a company vehicle or driving in the course of their employment, the employer may be liable for negligently entrusting the vehicle to a driver whose impairment was known or should have been discovered. Texas employers have a duty not to allow impaired employees to drive company vehicles, and failure to enforce this duty can give rise to employer liability in a wrongful death case.

Exemplary Damages for Drunk Driving Deaths

Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Chapter 41 permits exemplary (punitive) damages when the death resulted from gross negligence — an act or omission involving an extreme degree of risk and a conscious indifference to the safety of others. Drunk driving frequently meets this standard. Courts and juries in Texas have found drunk driving to constitute gross negligence in a significant number of cases, particularly when the driver had prior DWI convictions or an exceptionally high blood alcohol level. Exemplary damage awards in drunk driving wrongful death cases can substantially increase total recovery and reflect the moral condemnation of the defendant’s conduct.

Drugged Driving Wrongful Death Claims

The Rise of Drug-Impaired Driving Deaths

While alcohol-impaired driving remains the most common form of chemically impaired driving, drug-impaired driving fatalities have increased as marijuana use has become more widespread and prescription opioid, stimulant, and benzodiazepine use remains common. Detecting drug impairment in crash investigations is more complex than detecting alcohol impairment — blood tests rather than breathalyzers are required, and the relationship between drug blood concentration and impairment level is not as clearly defined as with alcohol.

Proving Drug Impairment in a Wrongful Death Case

Evidence of drug-impaired driving in a wrongful death case comes from multiple sources: law enforcement drug recognition expert evaluations, blood toxicology from autopsy or post-crash testing of the driver, witness accounts of the driver’s behavior, and physical evidence of drug use in the vehicle. Texas wrongful death lawyers who handle drug impairment cases work with toxicology experts who can explain the effects of identified substances on driving ability.

Prescription Drug Liability

When a driver was impaired by a legally prescribed medication, the prescribing physician or the pharmacist may potentially share liability if the medication was prescribed negligently, dispensed in excessive quantities, or if the driver was not adequately warned that the drug impairs driving ability. These cases require medical expert analysis and go beyond the standard negligent driver claim.

Distracted Driving Wrongful Death Claims

Phone Use and Fatal Crashes

Texting, social media, and phone calls behind the wheel cause a significant number of fatal crashes in Texas. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates that distracted driving contributes to hundreds of thousands of crashes annually in the U.S. Texas law prohibits texting while driving, and evidence that the at-fault driver was on their phone at the time of a fatal crash is direct evidence of negligence.

Obtaining Cell Phone Records

In fatal crash cases where phone use is suspected, Austin wrongful death attorneys immediately seek preservation of the at-fault driver’s cell phone records and data. Cell carrier records can show that a call or text was active at the moment of the crash. The driver’s phone itself may contain activity logs, app data, and navigation records that establish exactly what the driver was doing when the collision occurred. This digital evidence must be sought quickly before it is lost or deleted.

Employer Liability for Distracted Employee Drivers

When a driver was using their phone for work purposes — answering a work call, responding to a work email, or using a company-issued device — at the time of a fatal crash, the employer may share liability. Companies that allow or encourage employees to use phones while driving, or that fail to implement distracted driving policies for their workers, can face vicarious liability and negligent entrustment claims in wrongful death cases.

Other Forms of Distraction

Distraction extends beyond phone use. Eating, grooming, adjusting in-vehicle entertainment systems, interacting with passengers, and reaching for objects are all forms of distraction that can remove a driver’s attention from the road at a critical moment. Evidence of these behaviors is documented through accident reconstruction, witness accounts, and in some cases, data from the vehicle’s infotainment or driver assistance systems.

Drunk, drugged, and distracted driving deaths are among the most preventable fatalities in Texas — and among the cases where the moral case for holding defendants fully accountable is clearest. Austin wrongful death lawyers bring the evidence, the legal knowledge, and the commitment needed to deliver that accountability for families who deserve nothing less.


Here are all the other areas where we represent Injured Accident Victims

Cedar Park
George Town
Hutto
Kyle
Leander
Pflugerville
Round Rock
San Marcos